NEWS & ANALYSIS

Maureen O'GaraNeon Sues IBM for Antitrust

by Maureen O'Gara

No sense pussyfooting around anymore trying to sidestep the legal equivalent of nuclear war.

Texas ISV Neon Enterprise Software, accepting that it’s in a fight to the death with IBM over mainframes, ripped the kid gloves off late Wednesday, amended its pre-Christmas suit against its giant nemesis for tortious interference, business disparagement and unfair competition and charged Blue with antitrust violations.

Click to read more...

Why Choice Matters for Mainframe Customers

OpenMainframe.org Position Paper

The recent news that the US Department of Justice is investigating the IBM mainframe market has resulted in numerous stories and blog posts both for and against the investigation. However, many of the arguments have not addressed the most important question: what do mainframe customers want?
This paper addresses the key issues that impact the users of mainframe technology and why the resolution of these issues is critically important to mainframe customers.

Download the position paper PDF (147K)

Steven FriedmanThe T3 Technologies story

by Steven Friedman, T3 Technologies

For over 15 years, my company was a successful IBM Business Partner. I used to have a thriving company with over 50 employees, nearly 1,000 customers in 28 countries (including 200 customers in 15 European Community states) and a profitable revenue stream earned through selling mainframe solutions to IBM customers. However, now our company is effectively out of business due to the direct actions of the company I used to be closely aligned with: IBM.

Click to read more...

Roger BowlerThe case for opening up the mainframe market

by Roger Bowler, mainframe professional and creator of “Hercules”

I have been following the legal battles between IBM and Platform Solutions Inc. (PSI) and T3 Technologies (T3) over the last couple of years with great interest. As the founder of the Hercules open source mainframe emulator project I feel that we are impacted by many of the same issues that put both PSI and T3 out of business. As a mainframe IT professional, it bothers me that there is no longer any competition in the mainframe platform space.

Click to read more...

« 1994 - 1998 Termination of 1956 Consent Decree | Main | 1956 United States vs. IBM Corp Consent Decree »
Sunday
01Jan1984

1984 IBM European Commission Undertaking

During the early 1980s, the European Commission accused IBM of abusing its position as a dominant supplier by bundling its hardware and software and by not disclosing interface information. Despite concern expressed by the U.S. Antitrust Division over continuation of the European action, in 1984 the EC was on the verge of issuing a formal complaint when IBM agreed to an "undertaking.” In the Undertaking, IBM agreed to disclose interface information, at a reasonable and non-discriminatory charge, sufficient to allow both hardware and software manufacturers to attach their systems or networks to IBM mainframes and Systems Network Architecture within 120 days of the announcement of a new System 370 product, or at the time a product became generally available. It also agreed to sell unbundled System 370 computers with the amount of memory required for testing purposes within the European Common Market. Violation of the Undertaking could have lead to reinstatement of formal case proceedings. The Undertaking was to remain in effect for five years. In 1995, IBM unilaterally withdrew from its obligations covered by the Undertaking.

Click here for the text of the EC Undertaking ...