NEWS & ANALYSIS

EU Commission initiates formal investigations against IBM in two cases of suspected abuse of dominant market position

by Directorate General for Competition of the European Commission

(26 July, 2010)

The European Commission has decided to initiate formal antitrust investigations against IBM Corporation in two separate cases of alleged infringements of EU antitrust rules related to the abuse of a dominant market position (Article 102 TFEU). Both cases are related to IBM's conduct on the market for mainframe computers. The first case follows complaints by emulator software vendors T3 and Turbo Hercules, and focuses on IBM's alleged tying of mainframe hardware to its mainframe operating system. The second is an investigation begun on the Commission's own initiative of IBM's alleged discriminatory behaviour towards competing suppliers of mainframe maintenance services.

Click to read the announcement...

Click to read related news...

BowlerRoger Bowler Responds to IBM Patent Attack on Open Source

by Roger Bowler Creator of Hercules and Co-founder of TurboHercules

(Posted in News & Blogs section of turbohercules.com on 6 April, 2010)

As many of you know, the company I founded to promote the Hercules open source mainframe emulator, TurboHercules SAS, has filed an antitrust complaint against IBM with the European Commission in Brussels. We are not asking that IBM be subjected to punishing fines or anything like that. We simply want IBM to agree to allow legitimate paying customers of its z/OS mainframe operating system to deploy that software on the hardware platforms of their choice – including, should they so choose, on low-cost servers using Intel or AMD microprocessors and Hercules.

I want to make clear that we undertook this action reluctantly, and only after a long period of reflection during which we reached out to IBM to see if there was some way to resolve our differences amicably. I regret to report that IBM rebuffed our efforts at conciliation, and even added fuel to the fire by launching accusations against Hercules. I would like to take this opportunity to respond to some of those charges.

Click to read more...

The Issues of Competition in Mainframe and Associated Services in India

by Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations and Indicus Analytics

Very little is known about the extent and nature of competition in the mainframe and associated services market in India. This is the first study to analyze competition and related issues in the Indian server market, with an extensive focus on mainframe computing.

Download the report PDF (4MB)

Steven FriedmanThe T3 Technologies story

by Steven Friedman, T3 Technologies

For over 15 years, my company was a successful IBM Business Partner. I used to have a thriving company with over 50 employees, nearly 1,000 customers in 28 countries (including 200 customers in 15 European Community states) and a profitable revenue stream earned through selling mainframe solutions to IBM customers. However, now our company is effectively out of business due to the direct actions of the company I used to be closely aligned with: IBM.

Click to read more...
« IBM's Probes Show EU Will Continue 'Tough Stance' on Technology | Main | EU Adds IBM to Target List »
Tuesday
Jul272010

(Main)framed?

DateJuly 27, 2010

(The Economist) Newsbook blog

...The [European Commission's] probe into the alleged tying of software and hardware sales has been triggered by complaints from two firms, T3 Technologies and TurboHercules, which make “emulation” software that allows important applications to run on cheap, non-IBM hardware. They say that IBM won’t allow their customers to buy or license its mainframe operating system to use in conjunction with their software. T3 has lodged an antitrust complaint in America as well as Europe.

IBM retorts that the accusations are groundless and that the firms “want regulators to create for them a market position that they have not earned” by allowing them to effectively steal its intellectual property.  It has also accused them of being “satellite proxies” of Microsoft, one of IBM’s biggest competitors, which makes software that runs on servers that compete with mainframes. And it has been telling anyone who will listen that mainframes’ share of total server sales is so paltry that its market share needs to be seen in the context of the overall server market. It looks like big iron is set to generate some pretty big fees for competition lawyers.

Click to read more...

| Print ArticlePrint Article |
Categories:

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend